S O F T C R A F T Y

Loading

5 Mobile App Features Users Now Expect (And How to Deliver Them)

User expectations evolve rapidly, and lagging behind means uninstalls. Dark mode, once a novelty, is now mandatory—we saw 40% higher engagement after adding it to a news app. Offline functionality is equally critical; a retail client’s sales jumped 25% when users could browse products without signal. One-tap logins (via Google/Apple) reduce signup friction, while biometric authentication (fingerprint/face ID) boosts security. Finally, personalized push notifications (not generic blasts) drive 3X more opens. These aren’t luxuries—they’re table stakes. Our audits pinpoint which features will deliver the highest ROI for your specific audience.

Implementation matters as much as the features themselves. Dark mode isn’t just a color swap; it requires dynamic theming systems to avoid breaking UI elements. For offline use, we leverage SQLite for local data storage and conflict resolution when reconnecting. A travel app we built syncs user itineraries in the background, ensuring access even mid-flight. Push notifications need segmentation—sending location-based offers to users near a store, for example. These details separate functional apps from exceptional ones. We design with real-world usage in mind, not just checklist features.

The best apps aren’t built—they’re grown.

Future-proofing is key. Voice navigation (via Alexa/Google Assistant) is rising, so we structure apps with semantic labeling for accessibility. AI-powered search (like ChatGPT integration) can transform clunky filters into natural-language queries—a real estate client saw 50% longer sessions after adding it. Micro-interactions (e.g., haptic feedback when adding to cart) also enhance engagement. The best apps don’t just meet today’s standards; they anticipate tomorrow’s. Our development process includes “adaptability audits” to ensure your app can seamlessly incorporate emerging trends without costly rewrites.

How to Cut Mobile App Development Costs Without Sacrificing Quality

App development costs often spiral due to three mistakes: over-engineering features, poor requirement planning, and underestimating testing. We helped a startup reduce their budget by 35% by focusing on an MVP with just core functionalities (e.g., skipping custom animations in v1). Using cross-platform tools like Flutter also slashes costs—one client built iOS and Android apps for 60% less than native quotes. Another strategy? Reuse battle-tested open-source libraries for common needs (auth, payments) instead of building from scratch. The key is prioritizing what users truly need now, not nice-to-haves that can wait.

Smart backend choices save thousands. Firebase offers free-tier solutions for databases, auth, and analytics—perfect for MVPs. For a social app, we used Firebase’s real-time sync instead of custom WebSocket code, cutting 3 weeks of dev time. Cloud functions (AWS Lambda/Google Cloud) replace expensive always-on servers for sporadic tasks like PDF generation. We also advocate for “low-code” where possible: a restaurant app’s admin panel used Appsmith, saving $15K vs. custom development. These tactical compromises don’t hurt quality—they redirect funds to critical areas like security and core UX. Every dollar saved on boilerplate code means more for unique value.

Post-launch costs bite hardest. We structure apps for easy updates, avoiding situations where small changes require full rebuilds. Modular architecture lets clients add features later without starting over. For a fitness app, we decoupled the workout tracker from the payment system, enabling seamless subscription upgrades post-launch. Automated testing (via Appium/CircleCI) also reduces long-term QA costs. Finally, we document everything—from API specs to deployment scripts—so internal teams or freelancers can handle tweaks affordably. The goal? An app that’s not just cheap to build, but inexpensive to maintain and scale over 5+ years.

SaaS Pricing Models: How to Structure Plans for Maximum Growth

Choosing the wrong pricing model can stall even the best SaaS products. We helped a project management tool shift from flat-rate pricing (29/month) to a tiered model (Basic: $ 19, Pro: 49, 199), increasing ARR by 140% in six months. The key? Aligning price with perceived value. Usage-based pricing works for utilities like cloud storage, while feature-based tiers suit tools where advanced capabilities justify premium costs. Avoid “free forever” plans—they attract freeloaders, not buyers. Instead, offer time-limited trials with clear upgrade paths. Test pricing like you test features: use A/B trials to find what converts best.

Psychology plays a huge role in pricing perception. Anchoring your highest tier first makes mid-tier plans seem more reasonable—a tactic that boosted conversions by 22% for a CRM client. Another lever: annual billing with a 20% discount improves cash flow while reducing churn. We helped a marketing automation SaaS reduce monthly churn from 5% to 2.8% by incentivizing annual commitments. Always include an “Enterprise” tier (even if initially empty)—it primes larger clients to inquire about custom solutions. The right pricing isn’t just about numbers; it’s about framing value in ways that make upgrades feel inevitable.

Localization matters. A client selling globally saw 50% higher adoption in Europe after adjusting prices to euro denominations (€19 vs. $19) and offering VAT-inclusive options. Payment methods also impact conversions—adding PayPal in Germany and Alipay for China increased signups by 18%. Regularly audit competitors’ pricing but avoid races to the bottom. Instead, compete on unique value: one client bundled free onboarding consultations with annual plans, justifying a 30% premium. SaaS pricing isn’t set-and-forget; revisit it quarterly as your feature set and customer base evolve.